Swift Swift because of its excellent design, facial appearance, and regarded as a powerful engine, and soon become the first choice for middle and low sports car players after the listing. And its prototype is also modified in a foreign player's favorite objects we by foreign players experience to analyze how to modify it.
Chassis articlesSwift suspension system for the front MacPherson and rear torsion beam, very similar to the structure of the VW Polo and former Vice beam, similar body rigidity, plus factory tuned well and Swift has a Golf-like qualities, and manipulation The performance is quite amazing. However, from the structure of one-to-one comparison, European car solid is still better than the Swift, not only vice beam is more sturdy, torsion beam inside the structure as well as the torsion bar is added to strengthen, therefore the Swift suspension of rigid is still weak. Diagnostics OBD2Swift body to strengthen suite the most well-known is the Summit of excellent products, a variety of structural components not only angle design, and a wide range of sleek, well-shaped structures rod from the lever on the engine compartment and the luggage compartment trolley, strong chemical word beam, after suspension under the bar, such as enhanced packages are readily available, and all use of lightweight aluminum alloy. In addition, the most important used to strengthen the rear suspension of the torsion bar, with high strength, flexible, and easy to produce the metal fatigue of the chrome molybdenum steel is commercially best strengthening member.Do not change the shock absorbers, but the more tough the more biased racing style style changed chassis, tire grip, the more demanding, so directly talk about the good and bad of a shock absorber is not meaningful, soft bad hard like Diagnostics OBD2 originally misunderstanding, select or according to personal preferences. Therefore pick the best shock absorbers is to select the brand can be tailored to best avoid NA wasting money, it is best to consider the shock absorber tube using oil, gas separation design, the advantages to ensure that the oil is a long and intense manipulation no bubbles, is expensive.Original tire size 180/60/15 can not meet the requirements of intense driving, and 15-inch aluminum ring with thick body is not a good fit, it is recommended to upgrade the 16-inch aluminum ring and 195 wide tires cost much but does not affect the comfort. Upgrade to 205/40/17 specifications (6.5J4 hole 100), manipulative, ornamental are good starting performance influential, and tire inertia will be great, recommend the use of modified turbine engine is the best, unless The purchase is expensive lightweight forged aluminum ring. obd2 usb In addition, 17-inch aluminum circle Off-Set values recommended +40 tire wear body fender problem may occur because of the use of +44.
2012年8月21日星期二
Bottom Swift 1.3 or Swift 1.5, a choice
Not easy to pick the car can not be determined to buy a car! To play from the beginning of last month, I wanted to change the QQ to vehicles Swift open to open, but pick and choose, than to than to go, or did not make up his mind, not that I shaken, but a bit confused by it.
In fact, Swift also I once read, both exterior, interior or manipulative, I think Swift is not the problem, especially handling impress. Power good, feel good, shift speed corners climbing Swift performance are to our satisfaction, especially to the 4S shop opened, my wife is a fancy Swift 1.5 fantasy red. And other models contrast, Swift performance in all respects quite satisfied. Basically His wife and I have decided to buy, but a friend of mine but I bought 1.3, because he believed that home Swift 1.3 has sufficient power, alas! This time I have a headache! Is 1.3 or 1.5, in the end it? ? ? ?
Swift 1.3 in fact previously seen, the appearance would not have said, is known as the small MINI said Swift 1.3 will never lose to 1.5, which depending on what type you like! Interior are basically the same, nothing changes, compared to the maximum change of 1.5 and 1.3 Swift lies in its engine! With 1.5 Swift M15A engine matched with VVT technology, the entire operation process, the various systems to provide the greatest degree of fit, power, economy and emissions performance of each stage are effectively enhance the engine. Simple, and economic and fuel efficient also output of a large power! But 1.3 Swift is not bad, the power, though not of the 1.5 Swift but also has enough household had 1.3 space is not lost to Swift 1.5, so to say, I am really difficult choices! ! ! ! Prawns to it! ! !
In fact, Swift also I once read, both exterior, interior or manipulative, I think Swift is not the problem, especially handling impress. Power good, feel good, shift speed corners climbing Swift performance are to our satisfaction, especially to the 4S shop opened, my wife is a fancy Swift 1.5 fantasy red. And other models contrast, Swift performance in all respects quite satisfied. Basically His wife and I have decided to buy, but a friend of mine but I bought 1.3, because he believed that home Swift 1.3 has sufficient power, alas! This time I have a headache! Is 1.3 or 1.5, in the end it? ? ? ?
Swift 1.3 in fact previously seen, the appearance would not have said, is known as the small MINI said Swift 1.3 will never lose to 1.5, which depending on what type you like! Interior are basically the same, nothing changes, compared to the maximum change of 1.5 and 1.3 Swift lies in its engine! With 1.5 Swift M15A engine matched with VVT technology, the entire operation process, the various systems to provide the greatest degree of fit, power, economy and emissions performance of each stage are effectively enhance the engine. Simple, and economic and fuel efficient also output of a large power! But 1.3 Swift is not bad, the power, though not of the 1.5 Swift but also has enough household had 1.3 space is not lost to Swift 1.5, so to say, I am really difficult choices! ! ! ! Prawns to it! ! !
订阅：
博文 (Atom)